Friday, January 31, 2014

Income Tax Dependency Rules for Children of Divorced Parents

JC Leahy, MA Accounting
For parents who are divorced (and also legally separated, or have lived apart for the last six months of the calendar year) these are the rules to determine who gets to claim the children as dependents..

Generally, the dependency exemption for children of divorced taxpayers will
go to the parent who has custody of the child for the greater part of the calendar year. Periods of custody are measured by the number of nights in which the child resided with the parent. When the child spends an equal number of nights with each parent, the parent with the higher adjusted gross income receives dependency exemption.

In addition, the child must have been in the custody of one or both parents for more than one half of the calendar year.

There are three exceptions to the rule that a custodial parent is entitled to the dependency exemption.
 

  1. If there is a multiple support agreement that allows the child to be claimed as a dependent by a taxpayer other than the custodial parent, the multiple support agreement governs.
  2. When the custodial parent agrees to let the other parent claim the child as a dependent for income tax purposes, the IRS accepts that.   The agreement must be in writing and attached to the non custodial parent's tax return for each year the exemption is released.
  3. When a pre-1985 divorce decree or separation agreement grants the exemption to the non custodial parent and the non custodial parent provides at least $600 for the support of the child for the year

A word to the wise:  When there is confusion about who gets to claim the child as a dependent, the parent who filed his or her tax return FIRST has the "high ground" in that argument. :)

Identity Theft and Your Income Taxes

Identity theft protection: What is an IP PIN?

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Do Yourself A BIG Favor!! Get Help With Your Income Taxes !!!!!!!

JC Leahy, MA Accounting
According to H&R Block, taxpayers who filled out their income tax returns last year without professional assistance left a billion dollars behind in unclaimed refunds and overpaid taxes!!   Do yourself a BIG favor this year and get it right when dealing with the IRS!!!!! JC Leahy has a Masters Degree in Accounting and 35 years' accounting experience. He has been focusing on income taxes for 23 years. He has a dedicated office in his home in Silver Spring/Colesville, Maryland. In this private and confidential setting, he will spend as much time as needed to "get it right" when filing your income tax returns. If you're not near Silver Spring, JC Leahy can also work with you long-distance.  Unlike certain tax-prep chain operations and franchises, when tax season has ended, if you have any questions or problems, JC Leahy will be readily available to help you throughout the year.

Make an appointment:  Phone JC Leahy and Company LLC at 301-537-5365. 

Income Tax Question: Are Bankruptcy Attorney Fees Tax Deductible?

By JC Leahy, MA Accounting
Twitter@TaxHelpWhenNeed

LOL!!  That's a good one!! No, attorney fees related to bankruptcy are not tax deductible.  The only exception is if the bankruptcy attorney prepares your tax return, the portion of the attorney fees for tax return prep is tax deductible on your Schedule A as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the 2% of Adjusted Gross Income threshold

Get Your Annual Free Credit Report -- Check For Signs of Identity Theft

Fed law entitles you to one free copy of your credit report each year.

The government approved website for getting your free credit report is:

FREE CREDIT REPORT

 

Saturday, January 25, 2014

From the In Box: A History of Social Security

An E-Mail "forward" submitted by Josh Dee, MD

Subject: History Lesson on Your Social Security Card
  

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (and some older ones) didn't know this. It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it.  Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.[9]

An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security 

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social 
Security (FICA) Program. He promised: 

1.) That participation in the Program would be 
Completely voluntary, 

No longer Voluntary 

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual 
Incomes into the Program, 

Now 6.20% on the first $117,000 of salary or wages

3.) That the money the participants elected to put 
into the Program would be deductible from 
their income for tax purposes each year, 

No longer tax deductible 

4.) That the money the participants put into the 
independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the 
general operating fund, and therefore, would 
only be used to fund the Social Security 
Retirement Program, and no other 
Government program, and, 

Under Johnson the money was moved to 
The General Fund and Spent 


5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. 

Under Clinton & Gore 
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed 

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are 
now receiving a Social Security check every month -- 
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of 
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put 
away' -- you may be interested in the following: 

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---- 

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the 
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the 
general fund so that Congress could spend it? 

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically 
controlled House and Senate. 

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -- 

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax 
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding? 

A: The Democratic Party. 

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----- 

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social 
Security annuities? 

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 
'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the 
Senate, while he was Vice President of the  US 

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - 

Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants? 

AND MY FAVORITE: 

A: That's right! 

Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. 

Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, 
began to receive Social Security payments! The 
Democratic Party gave these payments to them, 
even though they never paid a dime into it! 

------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- --------- 

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), 
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! 

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! 
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of 
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will 
evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully 
sure of what isn't so. 

But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to? 

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers. 


Friday, January 17, 2014

Humor: Failure to Plan

Failure to Plan

You'll laugh for sure!  Failure to Plan 


. http://fullcontrol.org.uk/index.php/component/k2/item/147-workmen-installing-cast-iron-bollards-to-stop-nurses-from-parking?tmpl=component&print=1

Tax Implications of Foreclosures and Short Sales

 Income Tax Effects of Foreclosure or Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure
THE "FORECLOSURE WINDFALL PROFITS TAX"
By JC Leahy, MA Accounting

I arrived home from work and noticed my neighbors sitting on the curbside in front of their house.  They were a middle aged Hispanic immigrant couple.  She was an attractive woman who generally dressed well and drove off every day to some job.  He was a small contractor hard hit by the recession.  His biggest prime contractor had failed to pay him, toppling his finances like a row of dominoes.   His bank had repossessed the family home.  He didn’t even manage to remove all their belongings. The were locked out.  I approached them to talk.  He was friendly but avoided my eyes and hesitated when he talked, giving the impression of being ashamed and crushed – emotionally demolished.  She seemed horrified, involuntarily fidgety, trying to be stoic, unsuccessfully fighting back the tears.  Their son was nowhere to be seen.  I offered to put them up at my house.  He thanked me but said that their son had been sent to a relative.  He offered that there were good tools in his shed and I should grab what I wanted because he had no way to transport them and nowhere to store them.  He didn't realize his shed was already padlocked.  He, himself, would bunk at another relative, and his wife would bunk somewhere else.  He still had some tools and he said he would work hard and  try to rise from the rubble and pull his family back together.  He didn’t yet realize that he had  big potential problems with the Internal Revenue Service.
The income tax problem for the down-and-out property owner is twofold:  First, when the bank snatches your house – whether your home or your rental property – the tax law views that as a SALE of the house.  Viewing a foreclosure as a sale can crush you with big capital gain tax, especially if you have owned the house for a long time.  The second problem is that after you lose your house and the bank sells it at auction and the paltry proceeds don’t satisfy the mortgage – if the bank doesn’t come after you for the unpaid mortgage balance, the Internal Revenue Service views that as a big windfall for you  –  which means income that is fully taxable.  In summary, not only do you get to lose your house, but in the process you may realize a big capital gain and a huge windfall other “income” leading to a giant tax bill and the wrath of the IRS.  Sigh….I kid you not!!  So pay close attention.  Here are the details.  I like to call this set of problems the "Foreclosure Windfall Profits Tax."
There are 2 kinds of foreclosure: judicial and non-judicial.   Judicial is when the bank goes to court and gets a foreclosure through the court.  A trustee foreclosure is when the property is held by a trustee and a trustee sale is made without having to go to court.  There is also a way to avoid the hassle of an actual foreclosure called a “deed in lieu of foreclosure.”  This is when the property owner signs the property over to the bank in exchange for the bank’s agreement to let him off the hook for the mortgage balance in excess of whatever the house brings in at auction.  The property owner might prefer the deed in lieu of foreclosure because he can be sure the bank won’t be dogging him for years for the unpaid mortgage.  The bank, on the other hand,  might prefer NOT to take a deed in lieu of foreclosure for exactly that same reason.  More likely, however, the bank might prefer NOT to take a deed in lieu of foreclosure because it does not wipe out any second or third mortgages – home improvement loans, lines of credit, or similar junior loans secured by the house.  A foreclosure, on the other hand, will effectively wipe out the junior secured loans.  But from the IRS’s point of view, judicial foreclosure, non-judicial foreclosure, and granting a deed in lieu of foreclosure are all treated exactly the same.
To calculate your Foreclosure Windfall Profits Tax, you will need three key numbers: (1) the adjusted basis of your house, (2) the fair market value of the house at time of foreclosure, and (3) the balance of your mortgage at time of foreclosure.  Of these numbers, the easiest one to obtain is your mortgage balance.  Just look at your mortgage statement or ask the bank.  The fair market value of your house is trickier.  After all, who can say?  Generally, the FMV of your house is measured by what the bank is able to sell it for after foreclosure – THAT figure is the fair market value of the property. 
Probably the hardest number to come up with is the adjusted basis of your property.  This takes a little fact-gathering and arithmetic.  Here’s the formula for computing the tax basis of your home or rental property:
Original basis + capital improvements + selling costs – past depreciation on your house – past depreciation on your capital improvements = adjusted basis
The “original basis” in the above formula is what you paid for the house plus certain closing costs.
Here’s a link to a handy calculator for your property’s adjusted basis:  ADJUSTED BASIS CALCULATOR
Now that you have the 3 key numbers, you are ready to compute your capital gain and your “foreclosure windfall income” – which the literature calls “cancellation of debt income.”
CAPITAL GAIN OR LOSS
Capital gain from a foreclosure is equal to fair market value of the property minus the adjusted basis.  It’s that simple. If the result of the subtraction is negative, then it is a capital loss.  If you have a capital gain, then you parse it as such.  This means that if the capital gain is from the “sale” your principal residence, you may be able to use your $250,000/$500,000 exclusion to avoid taxes.  If, however, the house was your second residence, or vacation home, or rental property, you must pay income tax on the full capital gain.  If you have a capital loss, you may not claim ANY of it EVER, unless the house was a rental property - in which case it is treated as an investment.  For a  rental property, your capital loss may offset other capital gains if you have any.  If not,  you may claim $3,000 per year every year until you use up the total amount of the loss. 
FORECLOSURE WINDFALL INCOME – AKA CANCELLATION OF DEBT INCOME
Your cancellation-of-debt income is equal to the balance of the mortgage minus the fair market value of the property.  It’s that simple.  This can be a very big number and a rude shock to the down-and-out erstwhile homeowner, who thought he lost everything but is now told that he has huge chunk of windfall “income” and a consequent huge chunk of income tax liability.
 Fortunately,  in 2007 President Bush signed the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act which allows many, but not all foreclosed, homeowners to avoid a crushing tax bill.  Under present law, you do not have to include your “foreclosure windfall income,” (aka cancellation-of-debt income or forgiveness-of-debt income) in your tax return if you fit under one of these exceptions:
  1. The house was your principal residence and the mortgage money was used to buy or improve it.  See my recent Journal article for the details of this exception.
  2. The mortgage was discharged in a bankruptcy
  3. You were insolvent at the time of foreclosure.  Insolvency is a technical term that simply means that the sum of your debts exceeds the sum of the fair market values of your assets.  To the extent of this excess, your cancellation of debt income will be non-taxable.
  4. Certain farm debts
  5. The mortgage was a non-recourse debt.  Forgiveness of non recourse debt does not result in cancellation of debt income.  “Non-recourse” means that under the terms of the particular original mortgage or related state law, the bank has no final recourse besides taking the house and selling it for the proceeds.  In other words, you aren’t liable for the remaining balance.
  6. There is also an exception for certain business property, but rental property is NOT business property, so this exception does not apply to repossessed houses.  It would apply, for example, to a repossessed retail store.

REAL LIFE EXAMPLE

You have all the information you need to make Foreclosure Windfall Profits Tax calculations.  To show you how this all works, here's a real life. actual example.  Obviously, the names have been changed to protect privacy.

Mag Scratch is in her late 60's. She wanted to retire to Florida. She bought a condo there for $175,380, which, at the time,  seemed like a great bargain. She made a $30,000 down payment on the condo.  Unfortunately, she was subsequently unable to sell her home in Maryland, so she was burdened with 2 mortgages.  She couldn't retire at all.  Need for employment kept her in Maryland.  To help cover the mortgages, she rented out the condo in Florida.  She had trouble renting the condo, so even with what rent she could get, she could not afford the 2 mortgages.  As a result, in 2009, the bank foreclosed on the Florida condo.  The bank took the "deed in lieu of foreclosure" route.  The bank then sold the condo for $30,000.  Mag's investment was wiped out.  She was depressed.   Then she went ot see her tax advisor.

ADJUSTED BASIS OF MAG SCRATCH'S FLORIDA CONDO

The adjusted basis of Mag's condo is $175,380 original basis minus $12,549 of depreciation she claimed on her income tax returns in 2007 and 2008.  Thus, the adjusted basis comes to $162,831

CAPITAL LOSS

The fair market value of the condo will be specified on the 1099-C that the bank sends to Mag.  It will probably specify a fair market value was $30,000 -- the amount the bank got with it resold the house.   Do you think the bank would admit selling the condo for less than fair market value?  I think not.  So the 1099-C will give us a fair market value of $30,000.  We know from the above calculation that the condo's adjusted basis if $162,831.  Therefore, Mag has a capital loss equal to the $30,000 "sales price" minus the adjusted basis of $162,831.  The capital loss is $132,831.  If this were Mag's personal residence or vacation home, she could NOT claim the capital loss AT ALL on her income tax return.  However, since this is a rental property, she has a long-term capital loss of $132,831  that counts.  Unfortunately, like all capital losses, Congress only lets you claim $3,000 of it in any year. The rest of the $132,831 has to be  written of yearly at $3,000 per year.  So Mag can write off $3,000 every year until her $132,831 is used up -- if she lives that long.

CANCELLATION OF DEBT INCOME

Mag's initial mortgage amount on the condo was the $175,380 purchase price less the $30,000 down payment. This comes to $145,380.  Since that time, she has only managed to pay interest on the mortgage, so the balance is still $145,380.  Her cancellation of debt income is therefore $145,380 minus the fair market value of $30,000: $115,380.  Unlike her capital loss, this cancellation of debt income needs to be included in her income tax return right away.  In reality she has a $132,831 loss and a $115,380 income -- which altogether is a net loss.  But since all but $3,000 the loss needs to be spread out to future years and ALL the cancellation-of-debt income needs to be recognized immediately, Mag Scratch, who has worked and scrimped and saved at near poverty levels for her whole life, is now going to have a 2010 "Foreclosure Windfall Profit" of $112,380 ($115380 minus $3,000 capital loss write-off) and an extra income tax bill of over $20,000.  What a way for Congress to kick her while she's down!!   She folded her arms and looked sullen at the conclusion of this calculation -- and rightly so.

EXCEPTIONS THAT COULD SAVE MAG SCRATCH

Even after President Bush's signature of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, the exceptions to the Foreclosure Windfall Profits Tax are limited.  For details on exceptions, see our earlier article. Let's run through the big ones:

QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE DEBT: Nope, this is not Mag's personal residence.

QUALIFIED BUSINESS PROPERTY DEBT: Nope, rental is NOT A BUSINESS to the Congress.  If Mag were running a retail antique shop out of house, she would have an exception -- but there is no exception for a rental property.

BANKRUPTCY - Nope, Mag didn't file for bankruptcy.

NON-RECOURSE DEBT - Nope, Mag had a regular mortgage on a regular house or condo.  Even though the bank agreed, as part of the "deed in lieu of foreclosure" process, to NOT pursue her for any unpaid balance over and above what resale of the condo brings -- the the original underlying mortgage was a recourse debt.

INSOLVENCY -- Ah!  Here's a good one.  If at the time of the foreclosure Mag's debts exceed the fair market value of her assets, her cancellation of debt income is non-taxable to the extent of the excess of debts over assets.  So let's add up Mag's assets and liabilities:

Assets:
Condo        $30,000
Home         285,000
Savings        50,000
Car              11,500
TOTAL ASSETS: $376,500

Liabilities:
Home mortgage $57,000
Condo mortgage $145380
Credit cards  None
TOTAL LIABILITIES:  $202,380

Mag's assets exceed her liabilities.  Mag is therefore not insolvent.  She does not qualify for the insolvency exception.

Mag has suffered an actual loss. The net effect of all of the above is that Mag lost her $30,000 plus all the worry and cash she poured into the place while she had a negative cash flow.  In 2010 tax terms, she lost the $30,000 down payment less the depreciation she had claimed on her rental Schedule E. ($30,000 down payment minus $12,549  of depreciation equals the net loss of  $17,451, just as $132,831 capital loss less $115,380 forgiveness-of-debt-income equals the same net loss of $17,451.)   In an emotional sense, she also lost her hard work and emotional investment in her retirement planning. She lost her whole retirement strategy. To add insult to injury, Congress is going to tell Mag that she MADE $112,380 extra in 2010 and she therefore OWES an extra income tax amount of more than $20,000, plus extra state income taxes.  Because of Congress' Alice-in-Wonderland tax rules, Mag will not be retiring any time soon. 

PS -- If you've been reading carefully, you have a question.  If the bank foreclosed in 2009, why will Mag include this in her 2010 tax return?  Answer: the bank didn't resell the condo until 2010.  Until they know how much money they will get from the condo sale, they don't know how much unpaid mortgage will have to be forgiven.  Also, they don't know the fair market value of the property so that a capital gain or loss can be computed.  Therefore, the bank will wait until tax year 2010 to send out the 1099-C and it is in 2010 that Mag will report the capital loss and cancellation of debt income.


JC Leahy, MA Accounting
TaxHelpWhenYouNeedIt.com
301-537-5365
Twitter@TaxHelpWhenNeed
JC Leahy and Company, LLC
Silver Spring, Maryland

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Earned Income Tax Credit Requirements

You may be entitled to claim an EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit) on your 2013 federal and Maryland income tax returns if both your federal adjusted gross income and your earned income are less than the following:

• $46,227 ($51,567 married filing jointly) with three or more qualifying children
• $43,038 ($48,378 married filing jointly) with two qualifying children
• $37,870 ($43,210 married filing jointly) with one qualifying child
• $14,340 ($19,680 married filing jointly) with no qualifying children

If you meet this income eligibility you should go to go to the Internal Revenue Service Web site at www. Irs.gov  or contact your tax advisor to see if you meet the other federal criteria. Maryland taxpayers who meet all of the federal requirements may be eligible for a Maryland credit up to half of the federal EITC but not greater than the state income tax. Additionally, certain employees also may qualify for a refundable Maryland credit, or a local EITC.
If you need a tax advisor, consider TaxHelpWhenYouNeedIt.com, located in Silver Spring, Maryland.  We can meet with you in a private, confidential setting and spend as much time as needed to get it right as you make your income tax filings. And we're here for you throughout the year if you later have questions or problems.  Our phone number is 301-537-5365

Monday, January 13, 2014

Eight Reasons to File Your Income Taxes Early

JC Leahy, MA Accounting
Silver Spring, Maryland
301-537-5365
Twitter@TaxHelpWhenNeed

:

Here are 8 reasons to hurry and file your income taxes early:
JC Leahy, MA Accounting
  1. Psychological benefit - Getting your income tax filing out of the way early will probably give you peace of mind.
  2. Get your refund faster -- By filing your return early, you will probably get your refund not only sooner, but also faster.  This is because IRS processing centers are less busy during the tax season and can therefore process your return faster.
  3. Get your financial ducks in a row and avoid high interest debt - If you get your tax refund early, you can pay off high interest credit cards or simply use the early money to keep your personal financial house in order.
  4. Avoid crowds at the Post Office - If you're mailing your tax return, do you really want to deal with the crowd at the Post Office during the rush that comes later in the tax season?
  5. Discover filing problems early enough to deal with them  If you put your income tax filing together early, you may discover that you are missing information or have complications that need to be figured out before you file.  It's better to discover problems like this early so you can fix them before the tax filing deadline.
  6.  Reduce the odds of identity theft -- If you file your taxes early, there's less opportunity for identity thieves to file a fraudulent return on your behalf and collect your refund.
  7. Get the upper hand in martial disputes.  The spouse who files early and claims a child as dependent has the upper hand when the other spouse later wants to claim the same child as dependent.  Also, in cases where one spouse would rather file itemized and the other spouse filing separately would rather claim the standard deduction, the spouse who files first will probably get his/her way.
  8. Help with student financial aid.   You may need your tax data for yours or your child's college financial aid.  It's better to have this information early.

Do yourself a favor and get it right when dealing with the IRS !! For help filing your income tax returns, phone JC Leahy, MA Accounting, at TaxHelpWhenYouNeedIt.com  Tel. 301-537-5365 !!

Friday, January 3, 2014

Stealth Tax Increase for 2013 Income Tax Filers: The Personal Exemption Phase-out

JC Leahy, MA Accounting
Twitter@TaxHelpWhenNeed


Under the Clinton Administration, personal and dependency exemptions were reduced by 2% for every $2,500 that AGI exceeded a variety of AGI thresholds.  This provision returns for tax year 2013, but with different thresholds.  The new thresholds conform to the thresholds for itemized deduction phase-out. 


Beginning in 2013, personal and dependency exemptions will be reduced by 2% for every $2,500 that AGI exceeds these thresholds:


  • Married, joint                                 $300,000
  • Head of Household                         275,000
  • Single                                            250,000
  • Married separate                           150,000

Thursday, January 2, 2014

2013 Income Tax Return: Your Itemized Deductions May Vanish Before Your Eyes!!!

JC Leahy, MA Accounting
Twitter@TaxHelpWhenNeed

2013 Income tax filers will discover that Pease limitations on itemized deductions have returned with a new twist.   These limitations were the brainchild of Democrat Donald Pease,  then congressman from Ohio.  Under Pease’s scheme, up to 80% of your itemized deductions could vanish before your eyes at income-tax-filing time.  Most itemized deductions were reduced by 3 percent of the excess of your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) over a specified threshold or 80% of your deductions, whichever was less.  When George Bush got into office in 2001, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act resulted in the Pease limitations being phased out by 2010.  Thus, for tax years 2010, 2011, and 2012, taxpayers could claim the full amount of their itemized deductions on the Federal income tax returns.
This is one “Bush tax cut” which has not been extended.  Thus, middle income taxpayers filing their 2013 income tax returns may be distressed to find that the Pease limitation on itemized deductions is back.  There is a new twist, however.  Instead of a single AGI threshold, there are now different thresholds depending on filing status: $250,000 for single filers, $275,000 for heads of household and $300,000 for married-filing-jointly. 

 

2013 Income Tax Filers Will Find that Top Tax Rates Have Gone UP

JC Leahy, MA Accounting

2013 filers will find that the top income tax rates have risen from 35% to 39.6%.  The thresholds for this new 39.6% rate begin at $250,000 for married taxpayers filing separately.  For single taxpayers, the threshold is $400,000. For head-of-household, the threshold is $425,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $450,000.  This structure incorporates a significant marriage penalty.  An unmarried couple can pay the lower tax rate on up to $800,000 of income ($400k plus $400k), while the same couple, if married, would pay the lower rate on only $450,000.